Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,822 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 1 road tests and 5,822 + 2,191 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza S001 66, Turanza T001 65.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,822 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 58 · 2,191 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Bridgestone turanza t001 do I need to replace them with these small cracks ? It’s 4 year old since production and is it dangerous to travel alot with these small cracks?”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests | 79 | 69 |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 61 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 59.4 = 71
Turanza T001: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 60.8 = 66
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests | 85 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 64 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 59.7 = 75
Turanza T001: 60% × 76 + 40% × 63.8 = 71
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 37 | – |
Potenza S001: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 63 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 59 |
Potenza S001: 40% × 63 + 60% × 46.5 = 53
Turanza T001: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.8 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Turanza T001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 56 | – |
| Reviews found online | 55 | – |
Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.2 = 56
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 59 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 43 | 49 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58.6 + 40% × 42.8 = 52
Turanza T001: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 59 | 58 |
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests | 41 | 62 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Bridgestone Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 65 |
| Dry | 71 | 66 |
| Wet | 75 | 71 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 53 | 62 |
| Noise | 56 | – |
| Treadwear | 52 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 58 |
| Efficiency | 41 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza S001
Turanza T001
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #7/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 95% #6/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 73% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 81% #10/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #5/12 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
“The SL received 4 early Christmas presents. Had to replace the original factory Bridgestone run flat tires due to age. Was advised by the Mercedes Benz service department to replace the 8 year old tires even though the car only has 875 (now 900) miles. Costco had them in stock and approximately 1 hour later I was on my way back home. They wouldn’t sell me anything but run flat tires, no spare tire etc., and this is the only run flat tire that they offer in 19 inch tire size. Hope this helps anyone else who needs to buy new tires for their SL. Happy Holidays, Mike”
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
“Had them on our old 520d Tourer and no complaints, decent in the wet from what I can remember.”
Based on 43 community posts
Community discussions around the Bridgestone Turanza T001 largely center on replacement decisions, tire longevity, and tread aging. Users note that the tire provides a good balance of comfort, durability, and low road noise compared to sportier alternatives, though owners frequently question surface cracking after four years of use.
“Bridgestone turanza T001 and it’s 4 year old so do I need to change it or just wait for another year the cracks don’t seem to be deep to me so I need an expert on that it drives like it does normally doesn’t leak any air and the grip is fine”
“Bridgestone turanza t001 do I need to replace them with these small cracks ? It’s 4 year old since production and is it dangerous to travel alot with these small cracks?”
“If you can, stick to the same tyre all around as mentioned, don’t mix brands or models. So if you're keeping the Turanza T001s up front, rather just get the same ones for the rear. The S001 is more performance-focused, but the T001 offers a better balance of comfort and durability. It’s quieter, rides smoother, and tends to last longer. That said, if you’re thinking about moving to something sportier, skip the S001 and go straight to the Potenza Sport. It’s a newer and more advanced tyre, still within the Bridgestone family, and a solid upgrade in terms of grip and responsiveness.”
Based on 8 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Bridgestone Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | 37 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 320 - 740 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Bridgestone Turanza T001
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza S001 and Bridgestone Turanza T001 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza S001 is stronger on dry and wet. Bridgestone Turanza T001 is stronger on efficiency, comfort and treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 62 vs 41 on efficiency.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 62 vs 53 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Turanza T001, 62 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Turanza T001, 56 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Bridgestone Turanza T001, 62 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology