Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza S007A vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 80–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 83 · 42 tests Owners 73 · 2,346 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1483Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 70 76 Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 76.3 = 83
No road tests of dry for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +1684Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 67 77 Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 77.4 = 84
No road tests of wet for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online – 76 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 76.3 = 74
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +977Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 66 70 Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S007A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 43 Reviews found online – 72 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43 + 40% × 72 = 55
-
68
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +876Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 70 84 Reviews found online 66 65 Potenza S007A: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 65.6 = 68
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 64.6 = 76
-
74
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +175Why this score
Source Potenza S007A PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 74 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007A | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 80 |
| Dry | 69 | 83 |
| Wet | 68 | 84 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 68 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Potenza S007A
80
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S007A | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza S007A
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and high-speed cornering stability
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise steering response and excellent feedback
- Strong track-day performance with improved lap times compared to predecessor models
Cons
- Subpar wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance, especially when pushed
- Poor performance and sliding tendencies in colder temperatures
- Fast tread wear under aggressive driving conditions
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.
cliotrophy.co.uk
·2023-01-23
“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
r/nzev
·1 upvote ·2026-06-29
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
z4-forum.com
·2022-09-26
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Top themes
#wet weather grip#braking and safety#sidewall stiffness and comfort#tread wear and longevity#price and value comparison#road noise levels
Based on 16 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
80
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza S007A rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 83 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 76 vs 68 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza S007A or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza S007A or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S007A or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 83 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza S007A or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 77 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza S007A or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 76 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology