Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 27 road tests and 11 + 6,667 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 84–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 86 · 6,667 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
“A note about the pilot sport 4 S: in cold weather (below 5 degrees) even if it isn't icy, the tyre compound hardens and has dramatically reduced grip. They are excellent summer tyres though, good in the wet too. These days I run Uniroyal rainsport 5 and they're very good.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 95 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 92 |
Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 91.6 = 93
No road tests of dry for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 86 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 90 |
Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 86 + 40% × 90.4 = 88
No road tests of wet for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 84 |
Potenza S007A: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65
Pilot Sport 4 S: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 83.5 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests | – | 70 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 70 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 75 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 62% | 62% |
Potenza S007A: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 64.5 = 68
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.8 = 72
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 75 | 90 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests | – | 72 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007A | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 84 |
| Dry | 68 | 93 |
| Wet | 68 | 88 |
| Comfort | 65 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 90 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza S007A
Pilot Sport 4 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza S007A finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 2 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S007A | Pilot Sport 4 S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 62% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/22 | #1/22 | – | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.
“Quote: Originally Posted by D_H I hated the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tires. Was not happy with the wear. I wanted a drivable tire, and that's why I got them. They were pricy. Didn't last anywhere near the 30,000 mile range. Lasted just over 15,000 miles. Tire wear was not even, and the performance is a joke. But again, that's not why I got them. Tires always want to slip traction. I'm just going to stick with the stock tires from now on. I was wanting to know what everyone thought about these Atturo AZ850 front and rear tires though. I just put a very lightly used (from a friend) set of Atturo AZ850's in 1LE size on my 2020 2SS (I mounted them on MRR017 1LE Replica Wheels (285/30ZR20 Fronts and 305/30ZR20 Rears)), so far VERY happy with them especially considering the cost... They definitely hook better than my old 275 run flats...”
“Depending on the size they are absolutely overkill for street use on stock motor. I just installed a set of 245 ps4s on 17x9 rpf1s and its almost impossible to trigger the abs and traction co trol. The car is on absolute rails. That being said, if you have the money, there is not really any negatives from that. I intend to use mine on track days. Felt the cup 2s were overkill for 2 to 3 track days a year.”
“I was running pilot sport 4s on my MS. (19” wheels) I was lucky to get 13,000-14,000. I just switched to Kumho Majesty 9’s for about 1/3 the price. Currently have 4,000 miles on them and just to rotated. Fingers crossed I can get 13,000 miles out of them.”
Based on 208 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 110 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A - AA A |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza S007A rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 93 vs 68 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 88 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 75 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 78 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 88 vs 68 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 93 vs 68 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 78 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology