Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 70–69 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,186 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 69 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 65 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | – | 14 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 62 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 64 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
| Reviews found online | – | 61 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 61 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test | 62% | 85% |
| Source | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 71 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007A | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 70 |
| Dry | 69 | 74 |
| Wet | 68 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 68 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 69 |
| Handling | 74 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Potenza S007A
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/22 | #6/22 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 85% | −23.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Based on 22 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza S007A and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza S007A is stronger on comfort and handling. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 69 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 74 vs 71 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.