Tests 80 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 67 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 31 road tests and 67 + 1,929 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 89–79
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,929 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 4 tests that measured dry braking for both, Potenza Sport Evo won 1 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 1 (average 97% vs 97% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, Potenza Sport Evo won 1 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 2 (average 93% vs 94% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured dry handling for both, Potenza Sport Evo won 1 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 1 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Potenza Sport Evo won 1 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 1 (average 97% vs 97% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured wet handling for both, Potenza Sport Evo won 3 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 0 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
-
88
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +694Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 30 tests 92 96 Reviews found online 81 91 Dry Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–1 97% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–1 99% 99% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 84% 85% Potenza Sport Evo: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 81 = 88
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.1 = 94
-
88
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +492Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 31 tests 91 93 Reviews found online 84 92 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 92% 91% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–1 97% 97% Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 96% 86% Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–2 93% 94% Wet Circle (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 100% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 99% 99% Potenza Sport Evo: 60% × 91.1 + 40% × 84 = 88
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 92
-
74
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +579Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 10 tests 75 76 Reviews found online 74 81 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–1 85% 100% Potenza Sport Evo: 40% × 74.7 + 60% × 73.7 = 74
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79
-
45
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +3782Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 26 tests 30 93 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 94% 100% Potenza Sport Evo: 60% × 30.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 45
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 82
No owner ratings of noise for Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +1486Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 73 96 Reviews found online 72 70 Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 73% 77% Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 81% 100% Potenza Sport Evo: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 72.1 = 72
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86
-
86
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +490Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Reviews found online 86 90 -
47
Efficiency
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +2471Why this score
Source Potenza Sport Evo Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 26 tests 47 71 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 83% 90%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 89 |
| Dry | 88 | 94 |
| Wet | 88 | 92 |
| Comfort | 74 | 79 |
| Noise | 45 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 86 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 90 |
| Efficiency | 47 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Potenza Sport Evo
89
/ 100
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finished ahead 2 times and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 2 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza Sport Evo | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 97% | +0.1 | 1–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | +0.6 | 1–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 84% | 85% | −1.5 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% | 91% | +0.8 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test · 205/45 R 17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% | 97% | −0.4 | 1–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% | 94% | −0.7 | 1–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% | 98% | +1.7 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test · 205/45 R 17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 99% | +0.8 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 96% | 86% | +10.0 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 85% | 100% | −15.0 | 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Noise | Noise | 94% | 100% | −5.5 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 73% | 77% | −3.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 81% | 100% | −18.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 83% | 90% | −7.2 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #19/20 | #8/20 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Value | Cost | 67% | 90% | −22.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 77% | 77% | +0.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 100% | 100% | +0.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 89% | 93% | −3.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 83% | 96% | −13.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/50 | #8/50 | – | 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza Sport Evo
Pros
- Phenomenal dry and wet grip with excellent traction under heavy acceleration
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and quick turn-in accuracy
- Enhanced straight-line and cornering stability providing high driver confidence
Cons
- Potential for accelerated tread wear on aggressive or track use
- Tendency for front-end understeer on certain heavy-nosed front-wheel-drive vehicles
- Smaller rim protection profile on the sidewall compared to some competitors
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Pros
- Outstanding grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Noticeably lower road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and progressive handling at the limit
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly squishy feel or floatiness during aggressive quick transitions
- Some susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water at high speeds
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-12-06
“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
taycanforum.com
·2026-04-02
“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted.”
Top themes
#Strong dry grip#Michelin PS5 comparison#Comfort and ride harshness#Wear and durability#Cold-weather performance concerns#Value and pricing#BMW star OEM version#EV-ready and fitment questions
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 108 | 130 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 260 - 300 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 71 | 71 |
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better noise, efficiency and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 82 vs 45 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 71 vs 47 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 88 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo won 3 of 3 shared wet handling tests.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 88 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 88 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 45 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Potenza Sport Evo or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 71 vs 47 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology