Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 5 in 2010 Auto Bild Eco Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 79–70
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 42 tests Owners 73 · 2,343 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2019 Motor NAF/Vi Bilägare Summer Tire Test (Premium) (overall ranking)
“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1282Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 86 Reviews found online 72 76 -
73
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +1083Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 Reviews found online 74 78 -
–
Snow
No comparison73Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online – 76 -
70
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +777Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 71 70 -
–
Noise
No comparison52Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 39 Reviews found online – 71 -
67
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +976Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 68 65 -
71
Handling
PremiumContact 6 +475Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 71 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 79 |
| Dry | 70 | 82 |
| Wet | 73 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 70 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 52 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 76 |
| Handling | 71 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Turanza ER300 Ecopia
79
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 Ecopia | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/5 · 2010 Auto Bild Eco Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2019 Motor NAF/Vi Bilägare Summer Tire Test (Premium) | −50.0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300 Ecopia
Pros
- Good dry grip and dependable braking performance
- High level of ride comfort and smooth absorption of road imperfections
- Long-lasting tread life reported by several users on standard hatchbacks and saloons
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction, with multiple users finding wet grip disappointing
- Soft sidewalls that can diminish sharp steering response and cornering precision
- Some complaints regarding high noise levels from specific fitments
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.
r/ex30
·3 upvotes ·2026-08-14
“I switched out my 20” good year’s that came with the car for a set of continental premium contact 6 POL a month ago before a vacation trip. They were excellent in heavy rain. Can recommend. EX30 2024 TM Ultra.”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-05-04
“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
r/TyreReviews
·23 upvotes ·2025-05-25
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Top themes
#wet weather grip#braking and safety#sidewall stiffness and comfort#tread wear and longevity#price and value comparison#road noise levels
Based on 16 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 113 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
79
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 82 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 83 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 76 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 70 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.