Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 16 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 42 road tests and 16 + 2,358 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 82–72
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,358 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1284Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 74 78 Turanza ER300 Ecopia: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 72
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300 Ecopia. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +1085Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 76 80 Turanza ER300 Ecopia: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.4 = 85
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300 Ecopia. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +475Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 71 71 Turanza ER300 Ecopia: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 Ecopia. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 43 Reviews found online – 73 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 55
-
69
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +1079Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 71 65 Turanza ER300 Ecopia: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300 Ecopia. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
73
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +477Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 73 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ecopia PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 82 |
| Dry | 72 | 84 |
| Wet | 75 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 71 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Turanza ER300 Ecopia
82
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 Ecopia | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/15 2011 Finnish ECO Touring Tyre Test | #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300 Ecopia
Pros
- Good dry grip and dependable braking performance
- High level of ride comfort and smooth absorption of road imperfections
- Long-lasting tread life reported by several users on standard hatchbacks and saloons
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction, with multiple users finding wet grip disappointing
- Soft sidewalls that can diminish sharp steering response and cornering precision
- Some complaints regarding high noise levels from specific fitments
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
z4-forum.com
·2022-09-26
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
r/nzev
·1 upvote ·2026-06-29
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
r/croautomobili
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-31
“Zimska, WinterContact 870. Ljetna, Premium Contact 6. Mislim, i dalje (namjerno) furam 15 cola pa neću uzimat šrot za 50 eur kad Continental košta 80 eur.”
Top themes
#Excellent wet grip#Braking confidence#Soft sidewall comfort#High price#Tread wear longevity#Noise levels#EV fitment experiences#Comparison with Michelin/Pirelli
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 113 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
82
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 85 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 69 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 71 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 Ecopia or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 Ecopia or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 Ecopia or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 Ecopia or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 Ecopia or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology