Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 12 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT vs Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II is ahead, 74–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 25 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II +2173Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 44 76 Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 52
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II +2077Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 51 80 Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison69Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 69
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II +1973Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 47 74 Turanza ER300 RFT: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.2 = 54
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II +1471Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 51 73 Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II Reviews found online 51 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 74 |
| Dry | 52 | 73 |
| Wet | 57 | 77 |
| Snow | – | 69 |
| Comfort | 54 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza ER300 RFT
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300 RFT
Pros
- Decent dry grip and acceptable comfort for a run-flat tire
- Impressive tread life and mileage reported by highway and long-distance drivers
- Reliable OEM fitment integration for compatible vehicles like BMW models
Cons
- Subpar or near-zero grip in wet conditions, frequently causing traction control activation
- Harsh and noisy ride quality typical of the run-flat construction
- Rapid tread wear reported by some drivers on mixed roads
Tire B Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | B · Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II
Winner: Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 73 vs 52 on dry.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 77 vs 57 on wet.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 73 vs 54 on comfort.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II scores 71 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 RFT or Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 RFT or Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II?
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 77 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 RFT or Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II?
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 73 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 RFT or Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II?
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 RFT or Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II?
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus II, 71 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology