tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza ER300 is ahead, 68–55

Check price on Amazon · Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Turanza ER300 +15
    53
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6845

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Turanza ER300 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7052

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Turanza ER300 +10
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6348

    Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65

    Turanza ER300 RFT: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 48 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Turanza ER300 +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7051

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68

    Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza ER300 +13
    52
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Turanza ER300 RFT
    Reviews found online6552
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Turanza ER300Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Relative Score 68 55
Dry 68 53
Wet 70 57
Snow 66 –
Comfort 65 55
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 68 57
Handling (owners) 65 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Turanza ER300

± 8

Turanza ER300 RFT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza ER300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
  • Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking

Cons

  • High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
  • Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 review

Tire B Turanza ER300 RFT

Pros

  • Decent dry grip and acceptable comfort for a run-flat tire
  • Impressive tread life and mileage reported by highway and long-distance drivers
  • Reliable OEM fitment integration for compatible vehicles like BMW models

Cons

  • Subpar or near-zero grip in wet conditions, frequently causing traction control activation
  • Harsh and noisy ride quality typical of the run-flat construction
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some drivers on mixed roads
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 RFT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available23—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 70 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or Turanza ER300 RFT?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology