Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Dunlop Direzza DZ102 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 22 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza ER300 leads, 68–64 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Turanza ER300 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6863

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 68

    Direzza DZ102: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Direzza DZ102. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Turanza ER300 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    Direzza DZ102: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Direzza DZ102. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Turanza ER300 +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6258

    Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64

    Direzza DZ102: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Direzza DZ102. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Turanza ER300 +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7056

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 68

    Direzza DZ102: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Direzza DZ102. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza ER300 +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102
    Reviews found online6461
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Dunlop Direzza DZ102: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza ER300Dunlop Direzza DZ102
Relative Score 68 64
Dry 68 65
Wet 70 67
Snow 66 –
Comfort 64 61
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 68 60
Handling (owners) 64 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Turanza ER300

± 8

Direzza DZ102

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryTuranza ER300Direzza DZ102ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD #7/8 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza ER300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
  • Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking

Cons

  • High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
  • Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 review

Tire B Direzza DZ102

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement grip and cornering stability
  • Surprisingly high levels of ride comfort for a performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid or inconsistent tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Direzza DZ102 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 B · Dunlop Direzza DZ102
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available23—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG320 A A460 A A
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300

Dunlop Direzza DZ102

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 70 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 64 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Dunlop Direzza DZ102

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza ER300 or Direzza DZ102?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or Direzza DZ102?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or Direzza DZ102?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or Direzza DZ102?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 64 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or Direzza DZ102?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology