Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 199 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 1,731 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza ER300 is ahead, 68–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 1,731 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Turanza ER300 +1058Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 53 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 68
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Turanza ER300 +763Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 60 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
EfficientGrip: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
EfficientGrip +167Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 66
EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 67
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
Turanza ER300 +658Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 53 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64
EfficientGrip: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Turanza ER300 +1256Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 41 Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 56
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +1058Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 70 53 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 68
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Turanza ER300 +1747Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 EfficientGrip Reviews found online 64 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 60 |
| Dry | 68 | 58 |
| Wet | 70 | 63 |
| Snow | 66 | 67 |
| Comfort | 64 | 58 |
| Noise | 68 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER300
EfficientGrip
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 | EfficientGrip | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | #7/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B EfficientGrip
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Good fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Reliable wet and dry grip for everyday driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls result in a mushy or 'jelly-like' steering feel during cornering
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bulges, and punctures from road hazards
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip is mixed. It's often recommended as a comfortable, quiet, good-value summer or grand-touring tyre, and some owners report long life, such as 54k on one set. Others criticise it as twitchy and low on grip in the wet on the OEM SUV version, soft and vague in handling on the Performance 2, and prone to sidewall damage, cracking, chipping and slow leaks.
“Ultra contact is average, never tried e-primacy but currently on primacy 5 and they aren't worth the price . My brother drives on Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 currently, and they are way better than ultra contact ( he used them last year, and better than my michelin), so honestly it would be a no brainer to go with Goodyear for me. BUT since you're driving a mazda 3, can't you find continental premium contact in this size ? They are really GOOD, I had them last year, you always have good grip, dry/wet, doesn't matter, that tire is very alive in corner, it enjoys being pushed in corners, only downside is that they wear faster than Goodyear, but I say it's well worth it.”
“How bad is this? Should I replace these Goodyear efficient grips? Apparent tread chipping. DOT 2021, Made in 🇩🇪. Run 30k kilometres(18,000 miles). Mild off-roading on some back roads. Has seen 2 summers in Dubai. Chipping only in front 2 tyres. Diligently rotated tyres every 10k kms. Please advice …..”
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better handling, noise and dry. Where the Goodyear EfficientGrip is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 64 vs 47 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 56 on noise.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 58 on dry.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 64 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or EfficientGrip?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology