Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 199 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 199 + 3,359 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo3 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,359 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +775Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 68 60 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +1181Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 70 68 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Turanza ER300 +659Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 63 55 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.4 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Ventus S1 evo3 +573Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 71 ≈ 67 (est.) Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +1553Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 70 40 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.4 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Turanza ER300 +758Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 65 58 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison68Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 70 |
| Dry | 68 | 75 |
| Wet | 70 | 81 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 59 |
| Noise | 68 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 58 |
| Efficiency | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Turanza ER300
70
/ 100
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 | Ventus S1 evo3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | #6/8 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
r/Golf_R
·6 upvotes ·2026-04-29
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
insideevsforum.com
·5 upvotes ·2022-12-20
“For BMW-approved run flat tires, you should see a symbol that has the letters "RSC" in a circle next to the star symbol. (The "RSC" stands for "Run-flat System Component".) I don't see that symbol on the tire pictured, so it isn't a run flat. Hankook's model number for non-run flat S1 evo 3 tires is K127 whereas the run flat variant is K127B, sometimes referred to as the "SUV version". I only know this because of my quest earlier this year for efficient (yet still sporty) 225/45 R17 summer tires for my aftermarket wheels. In this size, the run flat variant actually has a better rating (B) for rolling resistance than the non-run flat (C) per the Euro tyre labels. This is a rare exception, as run flats are usually less efficient. Note that the non-run flat 205/45 R17 S1 evo 3 has an A rating, which is the most efficient. I haven't seen Euro tyre labels for the run flat variant in that size, but it seems unlikely to me they would have an A rating. As such, I would be surprised if MINI installed them at the factory due to the impact to range--unless they had no other option available due to supply chain constraints.”
teslamotorsclub.com
·2023-01-26
“You will love the Ventus S1 EVO3's, I purchased a set back in May 2020 for $473 delivered. In your climate driving at Texas speeds (75-85) efficiency is gonna be about 270-295 Wh/m. I just ordered a set of the iON EVO AS to try out as I have a need for snow use but not bad enough for snow tires.”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 110 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
70
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet, dry and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza ER300 if treadwear, handling and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 58 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 73 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology