Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 199 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Kumho Solus KH25 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Turanza ER300 is ahead, 67–43
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 26 · 17 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Turanza ER300 +2344Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 67 31 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
Solus KH25: 60% × 53 (est.) + 40% × 31.1 = 44
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Solus KH25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
Turanza ER300 +2445Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 69 36 Turanza ER300: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
Solus KH25: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 36.2 = 45
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Solus KH25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
Turanza ER300 +2342Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 54 (est.) Reviews found online 62 23 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65
Solus KH25: 60% × 54.2 (est.) + 40% × 22.6 = 42
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Solus KH25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Turanza ER300 +1947Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 63 26 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 66
Solus KH25: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 25.9 = 47
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 or Solus KH25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
Turanza ER300 +1950Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 24 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
Solus KH25: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 24.2 = 50
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300 or Solus KH25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +3234Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 67 11 Turanza ER300: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 66
Solus KH25: 60% × 48.8 (est.) + 40% × 10.9 = 34
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Turanza ER300 +2639Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Solus KH25 Reviews found online 65 39
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Kumho Solus KH25 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 43 |
| Dry | 67 | 44 |
| Wet | 69 | 45 |
| Snow | 65 | 42 |
| Comfort | 66 | 47 |
| Noise | 69 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 34 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 39 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER300
Solus KH25
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B Solus KH25
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Good dry weather handling and traction
- Decent tread life for some drivers
Cons
- Higher than average cabin noise
- Poor grip in snow, ice, and heavy wet conditions
- Concerns regarding sidewall durability and construction quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Kumho Solus KH25 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Kumho Solus KH25
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Solus KH25 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 66 vs 34 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 39 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 69 vs 45 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 67 vs 44 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology