Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 199 reviews
Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
C Drive leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
C Drive +471Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
C Drive +574Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 69 75 Turanza ER300: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 62 – Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
C Drive +672Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 74 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 66
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Level66Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 67 Turanza ER300: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 66
C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
C Drive +772Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 C Drive Reviews found online 65 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 71 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Turanza ER300
71
/ 100
C Drive
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B C Drive
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable, progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
- Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
71
/ 100
Yokohama C Drive
Narrow edge: Yokohama C Drive — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama C Drive scores 71 vs 67 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or C Drive?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or C Drive?
Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or C Drive?
Yokohama C Drive, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or C Drive?
Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology