tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 1,120 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Turanza Serenity+ 68, NanoEnergy 3 69.

Check price on Amazon · Turanza Serenity+ Check price on Amazon · NanoEnergy 3
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy 3

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    NanoEnergy 3 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6570

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66

    NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Turanza Serenity+ +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6866

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online58–

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    NanoEnergy 3 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6570

    Turanza Serenity+: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza Serenity+ or NanoEnergy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Turanza Serenity+ +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8173

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 75

    NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    NanoEnergy 3 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+NanoEnergy 3
    Reviews found online6170
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Turanza Serenity+Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Relative Score 68 69
Dry 66 69
Wet 69 68
Snow 63 –
Comfort 66 69
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 75 71
Handling (owners) 61 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Turanza Serenity+

± 8

NanoEnergy 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza Serenity+

Pros

  • Significantly reduced road noise and a quiet ride
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability
  • Reasonable and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Mediocre wet weather grip and potential for hydroplaning at higher speeds
  • Numbs steering feedback with slower response times
  • Prone to understeer during spirited or limit driving
All owner themes in the Turanza Serenity+ review

Tire B NanoEnergy 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
  • Great value for money and affordable pricing
  • Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate

Cons

  • Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
  • Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
  • Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy 3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—48
Rim diameters—13″ – 17″
Tread depth12/32″—
UTQG600 A A—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+

Toyo NanoEnergy 3

Too close to call: Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ and Toyo NanoEnergy 3 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ is stronger on treadwear. Toyo NanoEnergy 3 is stronger on handling, dry and comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 75 vs 71 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza Serenity+ or NanoEnergy 3?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza Serenity+ or NanoEnergy 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza Serenity+ or NanoEnergy 3?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza Serenity+ or NanoEnergy 3?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza Serenity+ or NanoEnergy 3?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 75 vs 71 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology