Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 36 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 36 + 6,449 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 87–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,449 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Pilot Sport 5 +2692Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 93 Reviews found online 65 91 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92
No road tests of dry for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Pilot Sport 5 +2594Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 68 94 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94
No road tests of wet for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 59 – Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 63
No road tests of snow for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
67
Comfort
Pilot Sport 5 +1279Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 65 85 Turanza Serenity+: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 67
Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.8 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Turanza Serenity+ +2347Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 33 Reviews found online 74 ≈ 67 (est.) Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47
No road tests of noise for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
75
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 5 +1287Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 81 79 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 75
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 87
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 5 +2789Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Reviews found online 62 89 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison64Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests – 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 87 |
| Dry | 66 | 92 |
| Wet | 69 | 94 |
| Snow | 63 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 79 |
| Noise | 70 | 47 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 87 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 89 |
| Efficiency | – | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza Serenity+
Pilot Sport 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza Serenity+
Pros
- Significantly reduced road noise and a quiet ride
- Impressive tread wear and long-term durability
- Reasonable and competitive pricing
Cons
- Mediocre wet weather grip and potential for hydroplaning at higher speeds
- Numbs steering feedback with slower response times
- Prone to understeer during spirited or limit driving
Tire B Pilot Sport 5
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
- Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
- Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
- Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.
“I had PS5’s on they were great literally all the grip you could ever want (not a very powerful car) and they have an incredibly long life span, I didn’t find them loud at all and i also now have an Audi a5 coupe and the car itself blocks out most noise especially if you have music on so it’s not something you should worry about, I know the Asym6 have more grip but it’s marginal I’d personally get the ps5’s just because of the beautiful side wall!”
“look at camskill,always the cheapest,ive just gotten the michelin ps5 for my M4 ,not fitted yet as my conti sport 7 still have life,only bought last month as there was a cashback offer from michelin at camskill,i got £80 so got 2 x 275-35-19 and x2 255-35-19 for £617 delivered,”
“Anyone else greatly disappointed with their Michelin Pilot sport 5? My 10th anniversary recently got a set of 16 inch ND wheels (due to better tires being available on 16s) and a set of brand new PS5s. It’s on the original bilstein suspension with H&R sway bars and poly bushings all around. After having driven the PS5s for around 4k km i have to say i really don’t like them most of the time. Pros: They’re numb, which is amazing for highway driving. You really can’t feel anything from the tires and they’re super quiet. Cons: They’re numb. I literally can’t feel what they’re doing, they just don’t give any useable feedback from the road and the main thing i do is spirited driving. They also overheat extremely fast? I take five to six quicker turns and on the next turn in the entire car is just sliding around doing whatever the fuck it wants all while there still being no feedback whatsoever.. I’m frustrated af because i thought i’d treat myself to a good nice quality set of tires for once and thats the result.. I have driven on Kumho PS71s for i think a thousand km’s last year and they were waaay grippier and gave very good feedback. The car just isn’t as fun to drive now and it sucks hard. Rant over, thanks for listening. Tldr: Tyre bad :(”
Based on 174 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ if noise matters most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 62 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 66 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 69 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 70 vs 47 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza Serenity+ or Pilot Sport 5?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza Serenity+ or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza Serenity+ or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Turanza Serenity+ or Pilot Sport 5?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 70 vs 47 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza Serenity+ or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza Serenity+ or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 75 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology