Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6571

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6575

    Turanza Serenity+: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 67

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza Serenity+ or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Turanza Serenity+ +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8165

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 75

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +13
    75
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6275
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza Serenity+Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 68 71
Dry 66 70
Wet 69 74
Snow 63 –
Comfort 67 73
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 75 65
Handling (owners) 62 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Turanza Serenity+

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza Serenity+

Pros

  • Significantly reduced road noise and a quiet ride
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability
  • Reasonable and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Mediocre wet weather grip and potential for hydroplaning at higher speeds
  • Numbs steering feedback with slower response times
  • Prone to understeer during spirited or limit driving
All owner themes in the Turanza Serenity+ review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″
Tread depth12/32″—
UTQG600 A A—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 75 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza Serenity+ or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza Serenity+ or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza Serenity+ or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza Serenity+ or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza Serenity+ or BluEarth Es ES32?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology