tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Blizzak LM-32 leads, 67–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-32 or Turanza T001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ABridgestone

Turanza T001

Summer

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 59 · 2,183 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tire BBridgestone

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 42 in 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)69–
    Reviews found online6168
  2. 71

    Wet

    Turanza T001 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)76–
    Reviews found online6569
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online–66
  4. 65

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online6164
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online–66
  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online5267
  7. 59

    Handling

    Blizzak LM-32 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online5964
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T001Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Relative Score 64 67
Dry 66 68
Wet 71 69
Snow – 68
Comfort 65 67
Noise – 66
Treadwear 58 67
Handling 59 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Turanza T001

Blizzak LM-32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTuranza T001Blizzak LM-32ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 33% #3/42 · 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tyre Braking Test −13.3 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza T001

Pros

  • Good dry grip and stable highway handling
  • Comfortable ride quality with low road noise on many surfaces
  • Solid steering feedback and direct road feel

Cons

  • Accelerated and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or drive wheels
  • Inconsistent or poor wet grip, with several users reporting aquaplaning risks
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or firm ride over uneven surfaces
All owner themes in the Turanza T001 review

Tire B Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
CategorySummerWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available3735
Rim diameters15″ – 19″15″ – 20″
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — better treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 67 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 64 vs 59 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

67

Narrow edge

Blizzak LM-32

Amazon