Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 13 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy R38 is ahead, 70–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
NanoEnergy R38 +571Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 72 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
NanoEnergy R38 +472Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
62
Comfort
NanoEnergy R38 +769Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 56 69 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 62
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Turanza T005 RFT or NanoEnergy R38. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
NanoEnergy R38 +1065Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 48 65 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy R38 +771Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT NanoEnergy R38 Reviews found online 64 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | Toyo NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 70 |
| Dry | 66 | 71 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 62 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza T005 RFT
NanoEnergy R38
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza T005 RFT
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
Tire B NanoEnergy R38
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry grip with predictable handling limits
- Good value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
- Solid longevity and mileage, with respectable tread wear reported
Cons
- Slightly increased road noise reported by some users
- Limited size or availability challenges noted by consumers wanting replacements
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo NanoEnergy R38 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 69 vs 62 on comfort.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza T005 RFT or NanoEnergy R38?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza T005 RFT or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza T005 RFT or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza T005 RFT or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 69 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza T005 RFT or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 65 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology