Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Firestone RoadHawk — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 37 + 17 road tests and 10,323 + 644 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza T005 is ahead, 70–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Turanza T005

Summer

± 4

Tests 76 · 37 tests Owners 62 · 10,323 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Lateral dry rot - Bridgestone Turanza T005 DOT 21, 3rd summer on service - all 4 tires have these cracks on their laterals, should I be worried?”

Firestone RoadHawk
Tire BFirestone

RoadHawk

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 40 · 644 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 12 tests that measured wet braking for both, Turanza T005 won 9 and RoadHawk won 1 (average 95% vs 89% of the best).
  • In 11 tests that measured dry braking for both, Turanza T005 won 7 and RoadHawk won 4 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured dry handling for both, Turanza T005 won 3 and RoadHawk won 4 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured wet handling for both, Turanza T005 won 4 and RoadHawk won 3 (average 98% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured noise for both, Turanza T005 won 5 and RoadHawk won 1 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  1. 76

    Dry

    Turanza T005 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 34 / 16 tests8582
    Reviews found online6346
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 11 shared tests · wins 7–497%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–499%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%83%

    Turanza T005: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 62.9 = 76

    RoadHawk: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 46.4 = 68

  2. 79

    Wet

    Turanza T005 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 35 / 17 tests8677
    Reviews found online7048
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 2–493%94%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–073%27%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 12 shared tests · wins 9–195%89%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%87%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 4–398%97%

    Turanza T005: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 79

    RoadHawk: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 47.5 = 65

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Turanza T005 +14
    51
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 2 tests7367
    Reviews found online6140
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–083%72%

    Turanza T005: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 60.5 = 65

    RoadHawk: 40% × 67 + 60% × 39.6 = 51

  4. 48

    Noise

    Turanza T005 +3
    45
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 8 tests3630
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 5–197%96%

    Turanza T005: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 48

    RoadHawk: 60% × 30.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 45

    No owner ratings of noise for Turanza T005 or RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 64

    Treadwear

    Turanza T005 +14
    50
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 6 tests7165
    Reviews found online5229
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–148%51%
    Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–071%63%

    Turanza T005: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 52.2 = 64

    RoadHawk: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 28.5 = 50

  6. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza T005 +28
    36
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Reviews found online6436
  7. 100

    Efficiency

    Turanza T005 +28
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 9 tests10072
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%93%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–095%86%
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Firestone RoadHawk: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005Firestone RoadHawk
Relative Score 70 57
Dry 76 68
Wet 79 65
Comfort 65 51
Noise 48 45
Treadwear 64 50
Handling (owners) 64 36
Efficiency 100 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Turanza T005

± 6

RoadHawk

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 18 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Turanza T005 finished ahead 15 times and Firestone RoadHawk 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryTuranza T005RoadHawkΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% 96% +1.4 7–4 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.4 3–4 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% 83% +6.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% 94% −0.9 2–4 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 95% 89% +5.7 9–1 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 90% 87% +3.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 98% 97% +1.7 4–3 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 73% 27% +46.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 83% 72% +11.1 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Noise Noise 97% 96% +0.8 5–1 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 48% 51% −3.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 71% 63% +7.6 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 98% 93% +5.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 95% 86% +8.7 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 64% 77% −12.9 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #2/20 #14/20 – 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 58% 62% −4.3 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #4/50 #20/50 – 15–3 in 18 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza T005

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and short braking distances in rain
  • Improved fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Confident, stable handling at highway speeds

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear and shorter overall lifespan reported by many users
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and lack of precision during spirited cornering
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking over time
All owner themes in the Turanza T005 review

Tire B RoadHawk

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
  • Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
  • Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption

Cons

  • Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
  • Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
All owner themes in the RoadHawk review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Mixed

Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided, with many drivers praising its wet-weather grip and highway usability. Conversely, numerous owners report significant concerns regarding loud road noise, rough ride comfort, rapid wear, and premature sidewall cracking or dry rot.

bimmerfest.com ·2020-09-20

“Only issue is possible ride quality with higher pressure. Dealer and independents seem to universally recommend going higher on tire pressures to maximize tire life for even wear on BMWs. I have been lectured on it a couple times at a locally respected suspension/alignment specialist over the years.”

r/CarTalkUK ·3 upvotes ·2022-12-15

“Bridgestone Turanza T005 tyres... Are they really shit or is there something wrong with my car? I've just had brand new ones fitted, I don't expect them to be amazing in this weather but I'm slipping and sliding all over the place. My car has less grip than my old tyres with 2mm left. Seriously, I went round a roundabout last night at 20mph and drifted out from the inner lane. Could there be something I need to get checked because I don't feel quite safe with them on... Read more”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2023-01-22

“Turanza T005 Hello, I bought a Seat Leon Cupra equipped with BRIDGESTONE TURANZA T005 XL in 225/40/18 92Y. I join you the card of the tire in attachment. It is the manufacturer model 13011. On the BRIDGESTONE website, there is a PDF with the list of all TURANZA models that I attach to this post. You can find the characteristics of the model 13011. Only here is one of my tires is damaged, and I would like to change it by the same model. First of all I can't find it on the online retailers. In fact, I can find references that look exactly the same. But there are some extra words that I don't understand. The abbreviations WAR/REP in the Trade Category column mean what exactly? I found the reference 8836 (or 13187) for example which corresponds in all points but the abbreviation REP is affixed in addition on the PDF. Please help me to find this information.”

Top themes
#wet weather grip#road noise and comfort#sidewall cracking dry rot#tread wear life#tire pressure sensitivity#oem tire replacement

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Firestone RoadHawk

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.

Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 B · Firestone RoadHawk
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available140115
Rim diameters14″ – 22″15″ – 21″
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common9292

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Firestone RoadHawk

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better handling, efficiency and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 64 vs 36 on handling.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 100 vs 72 on efficiency.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 79 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 65 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is straight aquaplaning

Firestone RoadHawk won 4 of 6 shared straight aquaplaning tests.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005
Tire B · Firestone RoadHawk

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 79 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 48 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 65 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 64 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Turanza T005 or RoadHawk?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 100 vs 72 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology