tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone RoadHawk vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 14 road tests and 644 + 8,168 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 68–57

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS71 or RoadHawk on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone RoadHawk
Tire AFirestone

RoadHawk

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 40 · 644 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 6

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 6 tests that measured wet braking for both, RoadHawk won 0 and Ecsta PS71 won 6 (average 88% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured dry braking for both, RoadHawk won 4 and Ecsta PS71 won 1 (average 95% vs 93% of the best).
  1. 68

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / 12 tests8278
    Reviews found online4672
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–195%93%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%98%

    RoadHawk: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 46.4 = 68

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 75

  2. 65

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +20
    85
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 13 tests7792
    Reviews found online4875
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–294%98%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 0–688%94%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%97%

    RoadHawk: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 47.5 = 65

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 85

  3. 51

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +19
    70
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests6775
    Reviews found online4066
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–156%78%

    RoadHawk: 40% × 67 + 60% × 39.6 = 51

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 75.3 + 60% × 65.8 = 70

  4. 45

    Noise

    RoadHawk +9
    36
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 8 tests3015
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–197%97%

    RoadHawk: 60% × 30.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 45

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 50

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PS71 +1
    51
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 6 tests6545
    Reviews found online2961
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–063%50%

    RoadHawk: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 28.5 = 50

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 60.7 = 51

  6. 36

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +37
    73
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Reviews found online3673
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    RoadHawk +24
    48
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 7 tests7248
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–094%73%
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone RoadHawkKumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 57 68
Dry 68 75
Wet 65 85
Comfort 51 70
Noise 45 36
Treadwear 50 51
Handling (owners) 36 73
Efficiency 72 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

RoadHawk

± 6

Ecsta PS71

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Firestone RoadHawk finished ahead 3 times and Kumho Ecsta PS71 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryRoadHawkEcsta PS71ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% 93% +2.1 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18
Dry Handling Dry 98% 98% +0.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 94% 98% −3.4 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 88% 94% −6.6 0–6 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 96% 97% −1.4 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 56% 78% −22.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 97% 97% +0.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wear Treadwear 63% 50% +13.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 73% +20.9 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 75% 80% −5.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #10/20 #19/20 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Value Cost 69% 58% +11.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #31/48 #12/48 – 3–3 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A RoadHawk

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
  • Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
  • Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption

Cons

  • Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
  • Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
All owner themes in the RoadHawk review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone RoadHawk

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.

r/automobil ·2025-11-20

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-09-18

“Not sure if it is what you are looking for. I am Polish but I live in the USA. I am still following info from Poland but I am not buying tires there anymore. A magazine Motor tests tires. magazynauto.pl Firestone was included in their "accessibly priced" summer tires: Firestone Roadhawk. They lost to Uniroyal, Semperit, Dębica but were ahead of Kumho, Apollo, Tomket, Imperial and Double Coin. They were not included in their premium and middle priced test. German based Auto Bild (and its Polish version Auto Świat) did a test in 2019 and the same Roadhawk passed the elimination test (53 down to 20: wet and dry braking distances added together as #13) and finished #18 in detailed test. So Firestone is present in Poland and Europe as a cheaper brand from Bridgestone but how popular it is I do not know. Krzyś”
Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2024-10-25

“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
r/TeslaUK ·2 upvotes ·2026-08-28

“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-05

“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone RoadHawk B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available115133
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Sizes in common7171

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone RoadHawk

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Firestone RoadHawk if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 73 vs 36 on handling.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Firestone RoadHawk scores 72 vs 48 on efficiency.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 70 vs 51 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Firestone RoadHawk, 45 vs 36 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 70 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Neither, by our numbers: 50 vs 51 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, RoadHawk or Ecsta PS71?

Firestone RoadHawk, 72 vs 48 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology