Tests – · none yet Owners 36 · 43 reviews
Continental 4x4 Contact vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 67 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
49
Dry
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2574Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 39 77 4x4 Contact: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 38.5 = 49
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of dry for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
52
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2577Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 45 80 4x4 Contact: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 52
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77
No road tests of wet for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1368Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 67 4x4 Contact: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 55
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of snow for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
49
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2675Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 39 77 4x4 Contact: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 39.2 = 49
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
57
Noise
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1370Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 44 74 4x4 Contact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 57
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
No road tests of noise for 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
36
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3773Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 17 77 4x4 Contact: 60% × 48.6 (est.) + 40% × 16.9 = 36
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
29
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +4574Why this score
Source 4x4 Contact Dynapro HP2 RA33 Reviews found online 29 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental 4x4 Contact | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 74 |
| Dry | 49 | 74 |
| Wet | 52 | 77 |
| Snow | 55 | 68 |
| Comfort | 49 | 75 |
| Noise | 57 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 36 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 29 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
4x4 Contact
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A 4x4 Contact
Pros
- Good traction and grip on both dry and wet roads
- Low road noise and a smooth, comfortable ride quality
- Competent handling for light on-road and mild seasonal driving
Cons
- Extremely rapid and disappointing tread wear for a premium tire
- Poor performance and grip in deep snow, ice, and muddy off-road conditions
- High price point relative to the short lifespan and fuel economy provided
Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental 4x4 Contact | B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 23 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 360 - 420 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental 4x4 Contact
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 29 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 73 vs 36 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 49 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 49 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Which is better in the wet, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 49 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 68 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 57 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 36 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology