Head-to-head Updated

Continental 4x4 Contact vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–48

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 49

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +25
    74
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online3977

    4x4 Contact: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 38.5 = 49

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    No road tests of dry for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 52

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +25
    77
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online4580

    4x4 Contact: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 52

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77

    No road tests of wet for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +13
    68
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4567

    4x4 Contact: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 55

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of snow for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 49

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +26
    75
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online3977

    4x4 Contact: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 39.2 = 49

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 57

    Noise

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +13
    70
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4474

    4x4 Contact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 57

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 36

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +37
    73
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online1777

    4x4 Contact: 60% × 48.6 (est.) + 40% × 16.9 = 36

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for 4x4 Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 29

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +45
    74
    Why this score
    Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
    Reviews found online2974
Scores at a glance
Continental 4x4 Contact vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental 4x4 ContactHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score 48 74
Dry 49 74
Wet 52 77
Snow 55 68
Comfort 49 75
Noise 57 70
Treadwear 36 73
Handling (owners) 29 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

4x4 Contact

± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A 4x4 Contact

Pros

  • Good traction and grip on both dry and wet roads
  • Low road noise and a smooth, comfortable ride quality
  • Competent handling for light on-road and mild seasonal driving

Cons

  • Extremely rapid and disappointing tread wear for a premium tire
  • Poor performance and grip in deep snow, ice, and muddy off-road conditions
  • High price point relative to the short lifespan and fuel economy provided
All owner themes in the 4x4 Contact review

Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental 4x4 Contact B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2349
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10 - 11/32″—
UTQG360 - 420 A A—
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental 4x4 Contact

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 29 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 73 vs 36 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 49 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 49 on dry.

Tire A · Continental 4x4 Contact
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Which is better in the wet, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 49 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 68 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, 4x4 Contact or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 36 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology