Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 7 reviews
Yokohama dB super E spec looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental 4x4 SportContact vs Yokohama dB super E spec — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
4x4 SportContact leads, 63–59 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
4x4 SportContact +859Why this score
Source 4x4 SportContact dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 67 54 4x4 SportContact: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67
dB super E spec: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 59
No road tests of dry for 4x4 SportContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
66
Wet
4x4 SportContact +858Why this score
Source 4x4 SportContact dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 65 53 4x4 SportContact: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66
dB super E spec: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
No road tests of wet for 4x4 SportContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
65
Comfort
4x4 SportContact +362Why this score
Source 4x4 SportContact dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 59 4x4 SportContact: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 63.1 = 65
dB super E spec: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
No road tests of comfort for 4x4 SportContact or dB super E spec. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
dB super E spec +458Why this score
Source 4x4 SportContact dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 46 53 4x4 SportContact: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54
dB super E spec: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for 4x4 SportContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
59
Handling (owners)
4x4 SportContact +356Why this score
Source 4x4 SportContact dB super E spec Reviews found online 59 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental 4x4 SportContact | Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 59 |
| Dry | 67 | 59 |
| Wet | 66 | 58 |
| Comfort | 65 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
4x4 SportContact
dB super E spec
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A 4x4 SportContact
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity for high-mileage drivers
- Consistent performance across multiple replacement sets
Cons
- Poor traction and wheel spin in wet conditions
- Inadequate grip on mud or loose surfaces
- Mediocre dry pavement handling
Tire B dB super E spec
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Reliable dry weather grip
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of rapid wear
- Poor performance in snow and slushy conditions
- Average wet weather traction compared to premium competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental 4x4 SportContact | B · Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental 4x4 SportContact
Yokohama dB super E spec
Narrow edge: Continental 4x4 SportContact — better dry, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama dB super E spec if treadwear matters most to you. Continental 4x4 SportContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama dB super E spec rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental 4x4 SportContact scores 67 vs 59 on dry.
Continental 4x4 SportContact scores 66 vs 58 on wet.
Yokohama dB super E spec scores 58 vs 54 on treadwear.
Continental 4x4 SportContact scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
4x4 SportContact or dB super E spec?
Which is better in the wet, 4x4 SportContact or dB super E spec?
Continental 4x4 SportContact, 66 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, 4x4 SportContact or dB super E spec?
Continental 4x4 SportContact, 67 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, 4x4 SportContact or dB super E spec?
Continental 4x4 SportContact, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, 4x4 SportContact or dB super E spec?
Yokohama dB super E spec, 58 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology