Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV vs Continental 4x4 SportContact — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 559 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV is ahead, 75–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
± 6

Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 78 · 559 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    4x4 SportContact: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for 4x4 SportContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7965

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 76

    4x4 SportContact: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of wet for 4x4 SportContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7263

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71

    4x4 SportContact: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 63.2 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or 4x4 SportContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 73

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +19
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7746

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73

    4x4 SportContact: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.7 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for 4x4 SportContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV +17
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Reviews found online7659
  7. 63

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV4x4 SportContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV vs Continental 4x4 SportContact: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUVContinental 4x4 SportContact
Relative Score 75 63
Dry 76 67
Wet 76 66
Comfort 71 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 73 54
Handling (owners) 76 59
Efficiency 63 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

± 8

4x4 SportContact

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence-inspiring performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and a smoother, more comfortable ride compared to competitors
  • Improved steering response and precise handling capabilities

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of traction in snow and wintry conditions
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight drop in fuel economy or EV efficiency for some users
  • Susceptibility to varying road surface textures, which can occasionally alter cabin noise levels
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV review

Tire B 4x4 SportContact

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity for high-mileage drivers
  • Consistent performance across multiple replacement sets

Cons

  • Poor traction and wheel spin in wet conditions
  • Inadequate grip on mud or loose surfaces
  • Mediocre dry pavement handling
All owner themes in the 4x4 SportContact review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV B · Continental 4x4 SportContact
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available442
Rim diameters17″ – 22″19″ – 20″
Tread depth8 - 9/32″—
UTQG240 - 300 A - AA A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV

Continental 4x4 SportContact

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental 4x4 SportContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 73 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV scores 76 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Tire B · Continental 4x4 SportContact

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or 4x4 SportContact?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or 4x4 SportContact?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 76 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or 4x4 SportContact?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 76 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or 4x4 SportContact?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV or 4x4 SportContact?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV, 73 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology