Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Yokohama dB super E spec looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama dB super E spec — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 71–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +1159Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 71 54 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 70
dB super E spec: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 59
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +1658Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 75 53 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 74
dB super E spec: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
73
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +1162Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 59 BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.5 = 73
dB super E spec: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32 or dB super E spec. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +858Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 65 53 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
dB super E spec: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
75
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +1956Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 dB super E spec Reviews found online 75 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 59 |
| Dry | 70 | 59 |
| Wet | 74 | 58 |
| Comfort | 73 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
BluEarth Es ES32
dB super E spec
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Tire B dB super E spec
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Reliable dry weather grip
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of rapid wear
- Poor performance in snow and slushy conditions
- Average wet weather traction compared to premium competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Yokohama dB super E spec
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama dB super E spec rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 56 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 58 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BluEarth Es ES32 or dB super E spec?
Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology