Head-to-head Updated

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 8 road tests and 3,362 + 142 owner reviews. How we score

AllSeasonContact 2 is ahead, 82–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

AllSeasonContact 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 85 · 31 tests Owners 79 · 3,362 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Iskustvo sa Continental AllseasonContact 2 Kupio ih u 10 mjesecu prošle godine zasada sam izrazito zadovoljan kako su se pokazale kroz zimu,pa me zanima kako su se vama pokazale kroz vise godina,pogotovo kroz ljeto.”

Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Tire BFalken

Euroall Season AS220 Pro

All Season

± 7

Tests 61 · 8 tests Owners 74 · 142 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 5 tests that measured dry braking for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 1 and Euroall Season AS220 Pro won 4 (average 93% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet braking for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 5 and Euroall Season AS220 Pro won 0 (average 99% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured dry handling for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 2 and Euroall Season AS220 Pro won 2 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 2 and Euroall Season AS220 Pro won 1 (average 94% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured wet handling for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 4 and Euroall Season AS220 Pro won 0 (average 99% vs 97% of the best).
  1. 83

    Dry

    AllSeasonContact 2 +3
    80
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 7 tests8784
    Reviews found online7874
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 1–493%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–299%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–090%77%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 78.4 = 83

    Euroall Season AS220 Pro: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 74.3 = 80

  2. 91

    Wet

    AllSeasonContact 2 +11
    80
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 7 tests9481
    Reviews found online8778
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–182%84%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–194%93%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–088%61%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–099%95%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–099%97%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–099%97%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 86.7 = 91

    Euroall Season AS220 Pro: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 78.1 = 80

  3. 81

    Snow

    AllSeasonContact 2 +23
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 24 / 6 tests8545
    Reviews found online7678
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–096%91%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–098%95%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–097%90%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–196%90%
    Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–087%65%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 81

    Euroall Season AS220 Pro: 60% × 44.9 + 40% × 78.1 = 58

  4. 87

    Comfort

    AllSeasonContact 2 +24
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 3 tests9250
    Reviews found online8372
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–096%83%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 40% × 91.5 + 60% × 83.3 = 87

    Euroall Season AS220 Pro: 40% × 50.4 + 60% × 72.2 = 63

  5. 74

    Noise

    AllSeasonContact 2 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 6 tests7965
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–199%99%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 78.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74

    Euroall Season AS220 Pro: 60% × 65.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    AllSeasonContact 2 +30
    45
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 2 tests7729
    Reviews found online7470
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%60%
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–084%53%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 73.9 = 75

    Euroall Season AS220 Pro: 60% × 29.4 + 40% × 69.5 = 45

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    AllSeasonContact 2 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Reviews found online8173
  8. 84

    Efficiency

    AllSeasonContact 2 +24
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 24 / 6 tests8460
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–097%87%
Scores at a glance
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContact 2Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Relative Score 82 67
Dry 83 80
Wet 91 80
Snow 81 58
Comfort 87 63
Noise 74 66
Treadwear 75 45
Handling (owners) 81 73
Efficiency 84 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

AllSeasonContact 2

± 7

Euroall Season AS220 Pro

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 6 times and Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryAllSeasonContact 2Euroall Season AS220 ProΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 94% −1.3 1–4 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.2 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% 77% +13.5 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 82% 84% −1.5 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 94% 93% +0.9 2–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 99% 95% +3.4 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Wet Circle Wet 99% 97% +2.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 99% 97% +2.2 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 88% 61% +27.5 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 96% 91% +4.9 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Handling Snow 98% 95% +2.9 3–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 87% 65% +21.5 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Slalom Snow 97% 90% +6.4 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 96% 90% +6.2 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 96% 83% +12.8 2–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Noise Noise 99% 99% +0.4 2–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 90% 60% +30.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wear Treadwear 84% 53% +31.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% 95% +1.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 97% 87% +10.2 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #2/16 #16/16 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Value Cost 70% 52% +17.8 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Road Rating (tester's mark) Other 80% 70% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #1/9 #9/9 – 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AllSeasonContact 2

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and short braking distances
  • High level of ride comfort with excellent bump absorption
  • Noticeably quiet and refined cabin noise compared to predecessors

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can result in delayed steering response or a less sharp initial turn-in feel
  • Faster tread wear reported by some users, particularly on front-wheel-drive or heavier vehicles
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage or delamination from severe potholes
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact 2 review

Tire B Euroall Season AS220 Pro

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip with reliable braking performance
  • Low cabin noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong snow traction and performance in cold weather

Cons

  • Slightly higher price point compared to some competing all-season brands
  • Slightly dead straight-ahead feel and softer turn-in reported by some drivers transitioning from summer tires
  • Slightly longer braking distances noted by select users when compared directly to specific summer tires
All owner themes in the Euroall Season AS220 Pro review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Positive

The community generally rates the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its wet grip, comfort, quietness, durability/mileage and capable all-weather performance including snow and Alpine ski trips. It is frequently chosen over the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Pirelli Cinturato SF3, though some users report weaker aquaplaning as tread wears, road noise on rough roads, and premature edge wear or cracking on front tyres.

Top themes
#Wet grip#Comfort and quietness#Snow and winter capability#Comparison with CrossClimate 2#Comparison with Pirelli SF3#Front tyre edge wear#Tread life and durability#Aquaplaning at low tread

Based on 70 community posts

Tire B

Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B · Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13861
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″ – 21″
Sizes in common5151

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro

Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — better treadwear, comfort and efficiency. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 75 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 87 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 84 vs 60 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 81 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is dry braking

Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro won 4 of 5 shared dry braking tests.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Tire B · Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Which is better in the wet, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 91 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 83 vs 80 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 81 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 74 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 87 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 75 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, AllSeasonContact 2 or Euroall Season AS220 Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 84 vs 60 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology