Head-to-head Updated

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AllSeasonContact 2

All Season

Tests 83 · 25 tests Owners 76 · 3,223 reviews

“My first all-season tires (Continental AllSeasonContact2) Hi everyone, I finally had my all-season tires installed: Continental AllSeasonContact2 235/60 R18 103T. Compared to the factory-equipped Hankook summer tires (in Italy you don’t get all-season ones…) I have to say they’re noticeably quieter. I tested them on the roads of the Dolomites between Belluno and Bolzano, and they performed excellently in rainy/sleety conditions. Let’s hope they last at least 2 years. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 81

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)85–
    Reviews found online76–
  2. 88

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)93–
    Reviews found online82–
  3. 79

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)83–
    Reviews found online72–
  4. 77

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online80–
  5. 76

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)82–
  6. 73

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)74–
    Reviews found online71–
  7. 78

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2BluEarth AllSeason 2
    Reviews found online78–
Scores at a glance
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContact 2Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2
Relative Score 80 –
Dry 81 –
Wet 88 –
Snow 79 –
Comfort 77 –
Noise 76 –
Treadwear 73 –
Handling 78 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

AllSeasonContact 2

BluEarth AllSeason 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AllSeasonContact 2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip and short braking distances in rain
  • High level of ride comfort and superior bump absorption
  • Very low noise levels and quiet operation, especially appreciated on EVs and hybrids

Cons

  • Faster or premature tread wear reported by several users
  • Softer sidewalls leading to a noticeable steering delay or initial dead spot
  • Susceptibility to pothole damage and sidewall vulnerability
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact 2 review

Tire B BluEarth AllSeason 2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Positive

Community opinion on the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is largely positive, with users frequently praising its excellent wet grip, comfort, low rolling resistance, and commendable performance in winter and snow conditions. Comparisons to competitors like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 highlight debates around noise, longevity, and dry handling, but the Continental generally wins favor for a balanced, quiet, and fuel-efficient daily drive.

Top themes
#Wet grip and safety#Winter and snow performance#Noise and ride comfort#Fuel efficiency and longevity#Comparison with Michelin CrossClimate 2#Comparison with Pirelli SF3

Based on 56 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B · Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2
CategoryAll Season—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available13873
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 21″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2

Only Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth AllSeason 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.