tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Continental VikingContact 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 0 road tests and 2,363 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

AllSeasonContact is ahead, 75–62

Check price on Amazon · AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental AllSeasonContact
Tire AContinental

AllSeasonContact

All Season

± 4

Tests 76 · 28 tests Owners 70 · 2,363 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (wet handling)

“Jeg har kørt udenmærket på dem på denne vej i min yaris, så længe jeg kører efter forholdene. Sad dog fast i dyb sne ved min indkørsel, som jeg burde have skovlet. Jeg skovlede den fri med 4-5 spader, og kørte så videre uden problemer. Ellers kun mistet grebet én gang på sort is med for meget fart. (kun slinger kørsel omrking 100m, fik kontrol igen). Edit: jeg ser lige at det er Continental AllSeasonContact jeg har, ikke 2.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    AllSeasonContact +10
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests69≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6653

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of dry for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 83

    Wet

    AllSeasonContact +18
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests87≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7663

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 87.5 + 40% × 76 = 83

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    No road tests of wet for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 82

    Snow

    AllSeasonContact +20
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests89≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7257

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 88.7 + 40% × 71.6 = 82

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    AllSeasonContact +10
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests72≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6956

    AllSeasonContact: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 69.4 = 70

    VikingContact 6: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 56.2 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for VikingContact 6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests61–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 61.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 63

    No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    AllSeasonContact +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests71≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6464

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 64.3 = 68

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    AllSeasonContact +15
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Reviews found online7257
  8. 88

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactVikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests88–
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContactContinental VikingContact 6
Relative Score 75 62
Dry 68 58
Wet 83 65
Snow 82 62
Comfort 70 60
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) 72 57
Efficiency 88 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

AllSeasonContact

± 8

VikingContact 6

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AllSeasonContact

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and snow traction
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort and cabin refinement

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in high-temperature summer conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise or specific frequency whining
  • Mixed feedback on dry-road performance during extreme heat
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact review

Tire B VikingContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and mountain conditions
  • Impressive durability and tread longevity, even when used out of season
  • Acceptable road noise levels

Cons

  • Significant loss of winter grip on snow and ice as the tread wears down
  • Squeaks on dry, warm tarmac when driven in warmer conditions
  • Lacks road feeling and sharp handling responsiveness
All owner themes in the VikingContact 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental AllSeasonContact

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental AllSeasonContact is generally positive regarding its winter and wet weather performance, but mixed when it comes to noise, ride harshness, and wear characteristics. Users appreciate its strong snow and rain capabilities compared to competitors, though some note drawbacks such as increased road noise or stiffness over time, particularly for XL-rated variants. Additionally, availability is primarily focused in Europe, making it a well-regarded option overseas while being largely absent in North America.

teslamotorsclub.com ·1 upvote ·2020-12-15

“I looked into tyres a while back (not getting the car until next week). In the US, they always seem to fit all-season tyres as standard, whereas the UK has summers as standard. I'm leaning toward all-season long term as I don't want to keep swapping as I currently do on my RWD BMW. Coming from BMW, I quite like the "safety" of runflat tyres, but these aren't readily available in standard Tesla 18" size (235/45), so I'm currently thinking of the Continental all-season Contact Contiseal tyres, which are self-sealing for most punctures, as a compromise. They have M&S & snowflake marking, are B-rated for rolling & wet-grip, and have excellent reviews.”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-07-01

“.... Nexen beats out Michelin, Continental, Goodyear and Nokian Surprise loser, is Michelin. Test winner: Nexen N blue 4 Season To solve the goal conflicts succeeds in the test the Nexen N blue 4 Season best. With good performances on wet and ice, the Korean tire on dry and snow-covered road is a bit weaker, but still acceptable. The new AllSeasonContact from Conti , on the other hand, solves the classic conflict of objectives of wetness vs. Snow very well - but at the expense of performance on dry roads. On dry land, the next-ranked Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 and Nokian Wheatherproof are also showing weaknesses. With the exception of the Firestone (worst dry and wet performance), all tires behind it ride on snow only below average - even the most expensive model in the test, the low- wear CrossClimate from Michelin”
r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2025-12-08

“Conti allseason contact harsh and noisy”
Top themes
#Winter and snow grip#Wet weather performance#Noise and ride comfort#Tread wear and durability#Comparison with competitors#Regional availability

Based on 15 community posts

Tire B

Continental VikingContact 6

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact B · Continental VikingContact 6
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10810
Rim diameters13″ – 20″14″ – 21″
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental AllSeasonContact

Continental VikingContact 6

Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental VikingContact 6 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 82 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 83 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 72 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 68 vs 58 on dry.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental VikingContact 6
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6?

Which is better in the wet, AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 83 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 68 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 82 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AllSeasonContact or VikingContact 6?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology