tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental VikingContact 6 vs Michelin X Ice Snow — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 7 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

X Ice Snow is ahead, 73–62

Check price on Amazon · X Ice Snow or VikingContact 6 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire BMichelin

X Ice Snow

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 79 · 19 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    X Ice Snow +10
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 62 (est.)65
    Reviews found online5372

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 68

    No road tests of dry for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    X Ice Snow +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 67 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6381

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 80.6 = 71

    No road tests of wet for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    X Ice Snow +15
    77
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 66 (est.)73
    Reviews found online5782

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 62

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 81.8 = 77

    No road tests of snow for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    X Ice Snow +21
    81
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)82
    Reviews found online5680

    VikingContact 6: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 56.2 = 60

    X Ice Snow: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 80 = 81

    No road tests of comfort for VikingContact 6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–81
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    X Ice Snow +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6483

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    X Ice Snow +19
    76
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Reviews found online5776
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests–77
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental VikingContact 6Michelin X Ice Snow
Relative Score 62 73
Dry 58 68
Wet 65 71
Snow 62 77
Comfort 60 81
Noise – 75
Treadwear 65 76
Handling (owners) 57 76
Efficiency – 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

VikingContact 6

± 5

X Ice Snow

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A VikingContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and mountain conditions
  • Impressive durability and tread longevity, even when used out of season
  • Acceptable road noise levels

Cons

  • Significant loss of winter grip on snow and ice as the tread wears down
  • Squeaks on dry, warm tarmac when driven in warmer conditions
  • Lacks road feeling and sharp handling responsiveness
All owner themes in the VikingContact 6 review

Tire B X Ice Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and lateral grip in deep snow and slush
  • High level of confidence and stability on icy surfaces
  • Excellent tread life and durability over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Average performance and handling on dry or wet pavement
  • Increased road noise as the tires wear over time
  • Can feel slightly 'twitchy' or less stable at the absolute limit of handling
All owner themes in the X Ice Snow review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental VikingContact 6 B · Michelin X Ice Snow
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10100
Rim diameters14″ – 21″13″ – 21″
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental VikingContact 6

Michelin X Ice Snow

Winner: Michelin X Ice Snow — better comfort, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental VikingContact 6 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 81 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 76 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 77 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 76 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental VikingContact 6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin X Ice Snow
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

VikingContact 6 or X Ice Snow?

Which is better in the wet, VikingContact 6 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 71 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, VikingContact 6 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 68 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, VikingContact 6 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 77 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, VikingContact 6 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 81 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, VikingContact 6 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology