tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Continental VikingContact 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–62

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +18
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8353

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of dry for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8463

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    VikingContact 6 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7257

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.1 = 53

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +17
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8056

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    VikingContact 6: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 56.2 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7564

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +22
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25VikingContact 6
    Reviews found online7957
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Continental VikingContact 6
Relative Score 73 62
Dry 76 58
Wet 80 65
Snow 53 62
Comfort 77 60
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 72 65
Handling (owners) 79 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

VikingContact 6

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B VikingContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and mountain conditions
  • Impressive durability and tread longevity, even when used out of season
  • Acceptable road noise levels

Cons

  • Significant loss of winter grip on snow and ice as the tread wears down
  • Squeaks on dry, warm tarmac when driven in warmer conditions
  • Lacks road feeling and sharp handling responsiveness
All owner themes in the VikingContact 6 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Continental VikingContact 6
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4010
Rim diameters16″ – 22″14″ – 21″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Continental VikingContact 6

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental VikingContact 6 if snow matters most to you. Continental VikingContact 6 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental VikingContact 6
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6?

Continental VikingContact 6, 62 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or VikingContact 6?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology