Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin Primacy 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 23 road tests and 2,368 + 13,422 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (wet handling)
“Originally Posted By: UG_Passat .... Nexen beats out Michelin, Continental, Goodyear and Nokian Surprise loser, is Michelin. Test winner: Nexen N blue 4 Season To solve the goal conflicts succeeds in the test the Nexen N blue 4 Season best. With good performances on wet and ice, the Korean tire on dry and snow-covered road is a bit weaker, but still acceptable. The new AllSeasonContact from Conti , on the other hand, solves the classic conflict of objectives of wetness vs. Snow very well - but at the expense of performance on dry roads. On dry land, the next-ranked Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 and Nokian Wheatherproof are also showing weaknesses. With the exception of the Firestone (worst dry and wet performance), all tires behind it ride on snow only below average - even the most expensive model in the test, the low- wear CrossClimate from Michelin LOL, I am waiting 25 years for ADAC to test tires after 20k. This is not first time ADAC has "surprise" winner.”
No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact or Primacy 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
68
Treadwear
Primacy 4 +13
81
Why this score
Source
AllSeasonContact
Primacy 4
Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 3 tests
71
85
Reviews found online
65
75
AllSeasonContact:60% × 70.9 + 40% × 64.5 = 68
Primacy 4:60% × 84.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 81
72
Handling (owners)
Primacy 4 +3
75
Why this score
Source
AllSeasonContact
Primacy 4
Reviews found online
72
75
88
Efficiency
Primacy 4 +5
93
Why this score
Source
AllSeasonContact
Primacy 4
Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 15 tests
88
93
Scores at a glance
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin Primacy 4: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Continental AllSeasonContact
Michelin Primacy 4
Relative Score
72
80
Dry
68
82
Wet
83
83
Snow
81
–
Comfort
70
76
Noise
63
71
Treadwear
68
81
Handling (owners)
72
75
Efficiency
88
93
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
± 5
AllSeasonContact
80
/ 100
± 4
Primacy 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Continental AllSeasonContact finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Primacy 4 3 times.
Discipline
Category
AllSeasonContact
Primacy 4
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry
Dry
91%#4/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17
99%#2/8 · 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16
–
Different tests
Dry Braking
Dry
88%
100%
−12.4
0–1 in 1 shared testNewest: 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling
Dry
94%
92%
+2.3
1–0 in 1 shared testNewest: 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
100%#1/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16
63%#12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning
Wet
81%#8/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test
96%#2/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17
–
Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning
Wet
93%#4/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19
99%#2/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17
–
Different tests
Wet
Wet
94%#2/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17
97%#2/8 · 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
82%
94%
−11.8
0–1 in 1 shared testNewest: 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Circle
Wet
100%#1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19
92%#13/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
91%
97%
−5.9
0–1 in 1 shared testNewest: 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
100%#1/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16
93%#2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
75%#5/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19
92%#4/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17
–
Different tests
Exterior Noise
Noise
97%#6/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19
100%#1/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
97%
98%
−1.6
0–1 in 1 shared testNewest: 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear
Treadwear
57%#14/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test
87%#2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Fuel Consumption
Efficiency
100%#1/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test
96%#7/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
93%#6/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test
83%#2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price
Cost
63%#9/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test
63%#10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental AllSeasonContact
Mixed
Community opinion on the Continental AllSeasonContact is generally positive regarding its winter and wet weather performance, but mixed when it comes to noise, ride harshness, and wear characteristics. Users appreciate its strong snow and rain capabilities compared to competitors, though some note drawbacks such as increased road noise or stiffness over time, particularly for XL-rated variants. Additionally, availability is primarily focused in Europe, making it a well-regarded option overseas while being largely absent in North America.
#Winter and snow grip#Wet weather performance#Noise and ride comfort#Tread wear and durability#Comparison with competitors#Regional availability
Based on 15 community posts
Tire B
Michelin Primacy 4
Positive
The Michelin Primacy 4 is generally praised for its comfortable ride, low road noise, and strong braking and safety in both dry and wet conditions. While many users report excellent tread longevity across tens of thousands of kilometers, some note faster wear on heavier electric vehicles or rough surfaces. It is viewed as a premium touring tire that is unsuitable for winter conditions, prompting some drivers to weigh its high price against newer models like the Primacy 5 or cheaper alternatives.
#ride comfort and low noise#tread life and durability#wet and dry grip#EV tire compatibility#Primacy 4 vs Primacy 5#poor winter and snow performance#premium pricing and alternatives
Based on 43 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Continental AllSeasonContact
B · Michelin Primacy 4
Category
All Season
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
108
57
Rim diameters
13″ – 20″
15″ – 20″
UTQG
—
340 A A
Sizes in common
51
51
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental AllSeasonContact
80
/ 100
Michelin Primacy 4
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better dry, treadwear and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology