tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 14 road tests and 2,368 + 590 owner reviews. How we score

AllSeasonContact leads, 73–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental AllSeasonContact
Tire AContinental

AllSeasonContact

All Season

± 4

Tests 76 · 28 tests Owners 69 · 2,368 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (wet handling)

“Originally Posted By: UG_Passat .... Nexen beats out Michelin, Continental, Goodyear and Nokian Surprise loser, is Michelin. Test winner: Nexen N blue 4 Season To solve the goal conflicts succeeds in the test the Nexen N blue 4 Season best. With good performances on wet and ice, the Korean tire on dry and snow-covered road is a bit weaker, but still acceptable. The new AllSeasonContact from Conti , on the other hand, solves the classic conflict of objectives of wetness vs. Snow very well - but at the expense of performance on dry roads. On dry land, the next-ranked Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 and Nokian Wheatherproof are also showing weaknesses. With the exception of the Firestone (worst dry and wet performance), all tires behind it ride on snow only below average - even the most expensive model in the test, the low- wear CrossClimate from Michelin LOL, I am waiting 25 years for ADAC to test tires after 20k. This is not first time ADAC has "surprise" winner.”

Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Tire BVredestein

Quatrac Pro

All Season

± 6

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 73 · 590 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 13 tests that measured dry braking for both, AllSeasonContact won 7 and Quatrac Pro won 5 (average 91% vs 90% of the best).
  • In 13 tests that measured wet braking for both, AllSeasonContact won 6 and Quatrac Pro won 7 (average 93% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 11 tests that measured snow braking for both, AllSeasonContact won 10 and Quatrac Pro won 1 (average 93% vs 85% of the best).
  • In 10 tests that measured dry handling for both, AllSeasonContact won 1 and Quatrac Pro won 7 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 10 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, AllSeasonContact won 8 and Quatrac Pro won 2 (average 95% vs 85% of the best).
  1. 68

    Dry

    Quatrac Pro +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / 13 tests6973
    Reviews found online6674
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 7–591%90%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 1–798%95%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0100%100%
    Dry (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–191%94%

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 68

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 74.2 = 73

  2. 83

    Wet

    Quatrac Pro +1
    84
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / 13 tests8785
    Reviews found online7681
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–087%68%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 8–295%85%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–175%100%
    Wet (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%92%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 6–793%94%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 4–697%97%

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 87.3 + 40% × 75.8 = 83

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 85.2 + 40% × 81 = 84

  3. 81

    Snow

    AllSeasonContact +27
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 11 tests8848
    Reviews found online7165
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%91%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 11 shared tests · wins 10–193%85%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 9–197%91%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–094%89%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–391%90%
    Snow (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%73%

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 71.1 = 81

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 47.6 + 40% × 64.7 = 54

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Quatrac Pro +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7173
    Reviews found online6977
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%80%

    AllSeasonContact: 40% × 71.4 + 60% × 68.8 = 70

    Quatrac Pro: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 76.9 = 75

  5. 63

    Noise

    Quatrac Pro +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 10 tests6175
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 2–598%99%
    Exterior Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–089%79%

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 61.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 63

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    AllSeasonContact +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 2 tests7156
    Reviews found online6567
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–088%69%

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 64.5 = 68

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 55.8 + 40% × 67.1 = 60

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac Pro +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Reviews found online7273
  8. 88

    Efficiency

    AllSeasonContact +39
    49
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 10 tests8849
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 9–094%83%
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContactVredestein Quatrac Pro
Relative Score 73 70
Dry 68 73
Wet 83 84
Snow 81 54
Comfort 70 75
Noise 63 72
Treadwear 68 60
Handling (owners) 72 73
Efficiency 88 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

AllSeasonContact

± 6

Quatrac Pro

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 15 tests that ran both, Continental AllSeasonContact finished ahead 11 times and Vredestein Quatrac Pro 4 times.

DisciplineCategoryAllSeasonContactQuatrac ProΔHead-to-head
Dry Dry 91% 94% −2.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 · 205/55R17
Dry Braking Dry 91% 90% +1.5 7–5 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 98% 95% +2.8 1–7 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 · 205/55R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 87% 68% +19.4 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% 85% +9.7 8–2 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Wet 94% 92% +1.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 · 205/55R17
Wet Braking Wet 93% 94% −1.3 6–7 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Circle Wet 100% 99% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 97% 97% −0.2 4–6 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 75% 100% −25.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 · 205/55R17
Ice Braking Snow 100% 91% +8.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 ADAC SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17
Snow Snow 91% 73% +17.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 · 205/55R17
Snow Braking Snow 93% 85% +7.9 10–1 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Handling Snow 97% 91% +6.3 9–1 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Slalom Snow 94% 89% +4.5 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Traction Snow 91% 90% +0.9 3–3 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% 80% +20.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Gute Fahrt All-Season Tire Test R18 · 235/55R18
Exterior Noise Noise 89% 79% +10.0 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Gute Fahrt All-Season Tire Test R18 · 235/55R18
Noise Noise 98% 99% −1.2 2–5 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wear Treadwear 88% 69% +19.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 83% +10.7 9–0 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 64% 73% −8.8 0–6 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #11/16 #15/16 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Value Cost 68% 64% +3.9 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #7/11 #9/11 – 11–4 in 15 shared tests Newest: 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AllSeasonContact

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and snow traction
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort and cabin refinement

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in high-temperature summer conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise or specific frequency whining
  • Mixed feedback on dry-road performance during extreme heat
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact review

Tire B Quatrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
  • Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
  • Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac Pro review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental AllSeasonContact

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental AllSeasonContact is generally positive regarding its winter and wet weather performance, but mixed when it comes to noise, ride harshness, and wear characteristics. Users appreciate its strong snow and rain capabilities compared to competitors, though some note drawbacks such as increased road noise or stiffness over time, particularly for XL-rated variants. Additionally, availability is primarily focused in Europe, making it a well-regarded option overseas while being largely absent in North America.

r/TyreReviews ·3 upvotes ·2025-12-08

“How old is the tyre? Are they correctly inflated? What car? what is the rating of the tire 91W, 94W, more? It's a XL tyre so extra stiff. The continental Conti ASC tyres are not quiet, but you bought a new car, so you do not know how quiet it cab be with other tyres. Some cars are just loud.”
r/AutomobileRO ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-15

“Am avut Conti All Season Contact Mk1 cu dimensiunea 235/45/18. Le-am tinut 4 ani, in care am facut 120.000 km cu ele ( 93% regim de autostrada ). La 65.000 km au inceput sa vibreze intre 120-130 km/hsi pe la 95.000 km zgomotul interior a crescut simtitor. La 120.000 lm, cu 4 mm adancime profil oe toate, le-am schimbat cu Conti All Season Contact Mk2. Am deja 9000 km cu ele : taie prin apa cel putin la fel de bine ca si Mk 1, franare sigura, zgomot mult redus ( efectiv liniste inauntru comparativ cu celelalte ). Motivul pentru care nu am schimbat cu Pirelli, e cam am vaxut rapoarte pe tyrereviews.com cum ca ar vibra dincolo de orice echilibrare, chiar si noi. Am trevut prin asa ceva - iti vine sa arunci masina. Nu multumesc. Te poti uita si la Michelin CrossClimate 3.”
r/dkbiler ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-11

“Jeg har kørt udenmærket på dem på denne vej i min yaris, så længe jeg kører efter forholdene. Sad dog fast i dyb sne ved min indkørsel, som jeg burde have skovlet. Jeg skovlede den fri med 4-5 spader, og kørte så videre uden problemer. Ellers kun mistet grebet én gang på sort is med for meget fart. (kun slinger kørsel omrking 100m, fik kontrol igen). Edit: jeg ser lige at det er Continental AllSeasonContact jeg har, ikke 2.”
Top themes
#Winter and snow grip#Wet weather performance#Noise and ride comfort#Tread wear and durability#Comparison with competitors#Regional availability

Based on 15 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10897
Rim diameters13″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Sizes in common6666

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental AllSeasonContact

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Narrow edge: Continental AllSeasonContact — better efficiency, snow and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac Pro if noise, dry and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 88 vs 49 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 81 vs 54 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 72 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 68 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Which is better in the wet, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Neither, by our numbers: 83 vs 84 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 81 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 72 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 68 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, AllSeasonContact or Quatrac Pro?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 88 vs 49 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology