Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 55 + 1,595 owner reviews. How we score

ComfortContact CC6 leads, 64–60 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,595 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6050

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 63

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Kinergy Eco 2 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6153

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.4 = 66

    No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    ComfortContact CC6 +18
    53
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7145

    ComfortContact CC6: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71

    Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–75
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    ComfortContact CC6 +10
    55
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6548

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 62

    Handling (owners)

    ComfortContact CC6 +13
    49
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Reviews found online6249
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
Scores at a glance
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Relative Score 64 60
Dry 63 63
Wet 63 66
Comfort 71 53
Noise – 71
Treadwear 65 55
Handling (owners) 62 49
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ComfortContact CC6

± 6

Kinergy Eco 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—48
Rim diameters—13″ – 17″
UTQG—200 - 400 A - B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Narrow edge: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better comfort, handling and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 62 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 66 vs 63 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ComfortContact CC6 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 66 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Continental ComfortContact CC6, 71 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology