Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +569Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 62 70 -
65
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +772Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 63 73 -
71
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +172Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 72 74 -
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 65 65 -
63
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +1073Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 63 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 70 |
| Dry | 64 | 69 |
| Wet | 65 | 72 |
| Comfort | 71 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling | 63 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ComfortContact CC6
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ComfortContact CC6
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 63 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.