Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6270
  2. 65

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6373
  3. 71

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7274
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6565
  5. 63

    Handling

    BluEarth Es ES32 +10
    73
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6373
Scores at a glance
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 65 70
Dry 64 69
Wet 65 72
Comfort 71 72
Treadwear 65 65
Handling 63 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ComfortContact CC6

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

BluEarth Es ES32

Amazon