Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Kumho Ecsta KU31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 55 + 165 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta KU31 leads, 67–64 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta KU31
Tire BKumho

Ecsta KU31

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 165 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ecsta KU31 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ecsta KU31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6067

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 63

    Ecsta KU31: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Ecsta KU31 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ecsta KU31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6169

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63

    Ecsta KU31: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    ComfortContact CC6 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ecsta KU31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7163

    ComfortContact CC6: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71

    Ecsta KU31: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    ComfortContact CC6 +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ecsta KU31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6561

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65

    Ecsta KU31: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta KU31 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ecsta KU31
    Reviews found online6267
Scores at a glance
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Kumho Ecsta KU31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Kumho Ecsta KU31
Relative Score 64 67
Dry 63 67
Wet 63 70
Comfort 71 65
Treadwear 65 63
Handling (owners) 62 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ComfortContact CC6

± 8

Ecsta KU31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B Ecsta KU31

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry and wet weather handling
  • Progressive and predictable feedback at the limit

Cons

  • Increased road noise and potential 'droning' as tread wears
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feel for some drivers
All owner themes in the Ecsta KU31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Kumho Ecsta KU31
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Kumho Ecsta KU31

Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta KU31 — better wet and dry. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta KU31 scores 70 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta KU31 scores 67 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ComfortContact CC6 or Ecsta KU31?

Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or Ecsta KU31?

Kumho Ecsta KU31, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or Ecsta KU31?

Kumho Ecsta KU31, 67 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or Ecsta KU31?

Continental ComfortContact CC6, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or Ecsta KU31?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology