Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
ComfortContact CC6 leads, 65–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
N FERA SUR4 +671Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 73 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
ComfortContact CC6 +1055Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 63 50 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +1160Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 51 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ComfortContact CC6 +1055Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 65 47 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
63
Handling (owners)
N FERA SUR4 +871Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 N FERA SUR4 Reviews found online 63 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 62 |
| Dry | 65 | 71 |
| Wet | 65 | 55 |
| Comfort | 71 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ComfortContact CC6
N FERA SUR4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B N FERA SUR4
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
- Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires
Cons
- High level of road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Fast tread wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ComfortContact CC6
Nexen N FERA SUR4
Narrow edge: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if handling and dry matter most to you. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 60 on comfort.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 55 on wet.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.
Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 63 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ComfortContact CC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Nexen N FERA SUR4, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 71 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology