Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 71–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6380

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Advan Neova AD08 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6369

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    ComfortContact CC6 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7267

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    ComfortContact CC6 +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6561

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online6379
Scores at a glance
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 65 71
Dry 65 75
Wet 65 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 71 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 65 63
Handling (owners) 63 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ComfortContact CC6

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ComfortContact CC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Continental ComfortContact CC6, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology