Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 42 road tests and 28 + 2,358 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 81–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,358 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +1584Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 69 78 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +1485Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 72 80 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.4 = 85
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
PremiumContact 6 +1374Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 54 77 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 61
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +975Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 65 71 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 43 Reviews found online – 73 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 55
-
71
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +879Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 74 65 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 71
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +877Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 69 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 81 |
| Dry | 69 | 84 |
| Wet | 71 | 85 |
| Snow | 61 | 74 |
| Comfort | 66 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 85% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 84% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 93% #29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 97% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #1/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 100% #1/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 60% #6/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 77% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental PremiumContact 6
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 69 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 85 vs 71 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 74 vs 61 on snow.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 66 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology