Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 28 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 70 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Primacy 4+ +978Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 69 71 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 78
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Primacy 4+ +779Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 72 74 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 73.8 = 79
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +571Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 65 69 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
Primacy 4+: 40% × 73.3 + 60% × 69 = 71
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +1485Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 95 Reviews found online 74 69 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71
Primacy 4+: 60% × 95.3 + 40% × 68.9 = 85
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
70
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +565Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 70 65 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison78Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 78 |
| Dry | 69 | 78 |
| Wet | 72 | 79 |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 85 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 65 |
| Efficiency | – | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Primacy 4+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 85% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 96% #3/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 98% #4/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 84% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 82% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 91% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 95% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #1/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 88% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 90% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | #4/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, dry and wet. Where the Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 71 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 69 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 72 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 71 vs 66 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology