Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Dunlop Direzza DZ02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 2 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop Direzza DZ02
Tire BDunlop

Direzza DZ02

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Direzza DZ02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Direzza DZ02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online72–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Direzza DZ02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Direzza DZ02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.1 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Direzza DZ02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Direzza DZ02
    Reviews found online70–
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Dunlop Direzza DZ02: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Dunlop Direzza DZ02
Relative Score 69 –
Dry 69 –
Wet 72 –
Snow 61 –
Comfort 66 –
Treadwear 71 –
Handling (owners) 70 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

Direzza DZ02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Direzza DZ02

Pros

  • Exceptional performance-to-price ratio
  • Strong handling capabilities on track
  • Competitive wet-weather performance compared to similar track-focused compounds

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Suboptimal ride comfort
  • Inconsistent wet-weather grip depending on track conditions
All owner themes in the Direzza DZ02 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Dunlop Direzza DZ02
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available39—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Dunlop Direzza DZ02

Only Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Dunlop Direzza DZ02

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology