Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews
General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs General AltiMAX RT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +465Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 64 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +567Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 72 66 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
61
Snow
Level61Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 55 55 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 61
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +365Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 62 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +465Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 71 64 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +564Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 AltiMAX RT Reviews found online 69 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 65 |
| Dry | 69 | 65 |
| Wet | 72 | 67 |
| Snow | 61 | 61 |
| Comfort | 68 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
AltiMAX RT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B AltiMAX RT
Pros
- Affordable price point offering high value
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
- Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
General AltiMAX RT
Narrow edge: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better wet, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology