Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Michelin Defender — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender
Tire BMichelin

Defender

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Defender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Defender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online72–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Defender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Defender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.1 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Defender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Defender
    Reviews found online70–
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Michelin Defender: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Michelin Defender
Relative Score 69 –
Dry 69 –
Wet 72 –
Snow 61 –
Comfort 66 –
Treadwear 71 –
Handling (owners) 70 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

Defender

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Defender

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Strong tread life and durability over several years
  • Reliable grip on dry pavement

Cons

  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain
  • Limited traction in deep or severe snow
  • Audible squealing during aggressive dry-pavement acceleration
All owner themes in the Defender review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Michelin Defender
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available39—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Michelin Defender

Only Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Michelin Defender

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology