tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs General Grabber X3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 119 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber X3 is ahead, 68–59

Check price on Amazon · Grabber X3 or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5571

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5971

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5470

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Grabber X3 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5458

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    ContiCrossContact LX +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6352

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Grabber X3 +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4665

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber X3 +7
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber X3
    Reviews found online5158
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXGeneral Grabber X3
Relative Score 59 68
Dry 59 70
Wet 61 71
Snow 60 70
Comfort 62 64
Noise 66 61
Treadwear 54 65
Handling (owners) 51 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX

Grabber X3

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · General Grabber X3
CategoryAll SeasonMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available46
Rim diameters16″ – 18″16″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″18 - 21/32″
UTQG680 A BAA A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering
Max pressure44 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

General Grabber X3

Winner: General Grabber X3 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental ContiCrossContact LX if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber X3 scores 71 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 60 on snow.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber X3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 66 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology