tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–59

Check price on Amazon · Proxes ST or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Proxes ST +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5575

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Proxes ST +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5977

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Proxes ST +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5464

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +10
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5474

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4672

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +20
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXProxes ST
    Reviews found online5171
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXToyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 59 71
Dry 59 72
Wet 61 75
Snow 60 66
Comfort 62 72
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 54 69
Handling (owners) 51 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available41
Rim diameters16″ – 18″19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG680 A B—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology