Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 72–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +371Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 73 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1755Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 73 50 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1060Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 51 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1055Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 64 47 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +571Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N FERA SUR4 Reviews found online 76 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 62 |
| Dry | 74 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 55 |
| Comfort | 70 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
N FERA SUR4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B N FERA SUR4
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
- Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires
Cons
- High level of road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Fast tread wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Nexen N FERA SUR4
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 55 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 72 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N FERA SUR4?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 65 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology