Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 41 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 41 + 111 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF2 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 79 · 111 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +272Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 77 79 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
Proxes CF2: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 79.3 = 72
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Proxes CF2 +275Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 73 81 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 81 = 75
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes CF2 +675Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 78 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
Proxes CF2: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.2 = 75
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Proxes CF2 +973Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 77 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF2 +281Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Proxes CF2 Reviews found online 79 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 74 |
| Dry | 74 | 72 |
| Wet | 73 | 75 |
| Comfort | 69 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
Proxes CF2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Proxes CF2
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling
Cons
- Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
- Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
- Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 55 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Toyo Proxes CF2
Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better treadwear and comfort. Where the Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 75 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes CF2?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes CF2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes CF2?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 75 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology