Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 41 reviews
Toyo Tranpath looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Toyo Tranpath — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +569Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 77 70 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
Tranpath: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +271Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73
Tranpath: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Tranpath +271Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 70 71 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
Tranpath: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Tranpath +165Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Tranpath Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 63 64 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Tranpath: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1069Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Tranpath Reviews found online 79 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Toyo Tranpath |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 74 | 69 |
| Wet | 73 | 71 |
| Comfort | 69 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
Tranpath
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Tranpath
Pros
- Reliable dry weather traction
- Consistent grip in cold temperatures
- Solid performance on SUV platforms
Cons
- Disappointing tread life relative to price
- Mediocre wet weather performance
- Poor traction in mud or off-road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Toyo Tranpath |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Toyo Tranpath
Narrow edge: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling and dry. Where the Toyo Tranpath is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo Tranpath rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 79 vs 69 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or Tranpath?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Tranpath?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Tranpath?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Tranpath?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Tranpath?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology