Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 72–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1361Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 77 58 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1062Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 59 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +664Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 58 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 64 64 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1759Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 A.Drive Reviews found online 76 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 62 |
| Dry | 74 | 61 |
| Wet | 72 | 62 |
| Comfort | 70 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ContiMaxContact MC6
62
/ 100
A.Drive
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B A.Drive
Pros
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
- Solid durability and tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
62
/ 100
Yokohama A.Drive
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or A.Drive?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or A.Drive?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or A.Drive?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or A.Drive?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or A.Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology