tirewheelguide

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 72, Advan Neova AD08 71.

Check price on Amazon · ContiMaxContact MC6 Check price on Amazon · Advan Neova AD08
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7780

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6461

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    79
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7679
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 74 75
Wet 72 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 70 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 65 63
Handling (owners) 76 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiMaxContact MC6

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3—
Rim diameters19″ – 21″—
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology