Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 72–47

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport ZPS

Summer Max Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 33 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +25
    50
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7841

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 75

    Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 41.1 = 50

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +27
    46
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online7437

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 73

    Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 51.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 46

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online–15

    Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 49.8 (est.) + 40% × 14.8 = 36

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +24
    46
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7134

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    Advan Sport ZPS: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 34.3 = 46

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–25

    Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 25.1 = 50

    No road tests of noise for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +19
    45
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online6332

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 64

    Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 32.2 = 45

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +35
    44
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport ZPS
    Reviews found online7944
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
Relative Score 72 47
Dry 75 50
Wet 73 46
Snow – 36
Comfort 70 46
Noise – 50
Treadwear 64 45
Handling (owners) 79 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiMaxContact MC6

± 8

Advan Sport ZPS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Advan Sport ZPS

Pros

  • Affordable pricing for a run-flat performance tire
  • Excellent dry grip and high-speed cornering stability
  • Progressive handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Extremely harsh and stiff ride quality
  • Unsatisfactory tread life with reports of premature wear
  • High road noise
All owner themes in the Advan Sport ZPS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
CategorySummerSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available34
Rim diameters19″ – 21″16″ – 18″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 79 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 73 vs 46 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 75 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 46 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Sport ZPS?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Sport ZPS?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 73 vs 46 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Sport ZPS?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 75 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Sport ZPS?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 70 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Advan Sport ZPS?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 64 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology