Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 72, C Drive 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +371Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 73 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
C Drive +274Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
C Drive +272Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 74 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
C Drive +166Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 67 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +472Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 C Drive Reviews found online 76 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 74 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
C Drive
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B C Drive
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable, progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
- Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Yokohama C Drive
Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Yokohama C Drive are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or C Drive?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or C Drive?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology